ESTCP Report: Post-Remediation Performance Assessment at a Petroleum Impacted Site

Official ESTCP Audio Summary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HREpiJpzsp8

This is a detailed report about an investigation at a Navy Air Station in which a multi-tiered approach was used to address: i) Site characterization focused on the residual risk due to LNAPL composition, ii) LNAPL recovery and mobility based on transmissivity, and iii) NSZD rate quantification using E-Flux CO2 traps. The primary objective was to help the US Department of Defense (DoD) make a stronger case for the closure of legacy petroleum sites using risk-based decisions.

The report documents descriptions of the technologies used, cost and performance assessments, and implementation issues. Based on solid data, this report documents that NSZD is a feasible remedy of comparable efficiency to active remedies that had met their design performance. Four remedial alternatives were considered: i) Land Use Controls/Institutional Controls after NSZD/MNA evaluation, ii) NSZD/MNA, iii) bi-weekly free product recovery using manual bailing/skimming before transitioning to NSZD/MNA, and iv) dual phase extraction followed by NSZD/MNA. Based on a cost analysis for 15 years, NSZD/MNA was about 2x more expensive than LUC/IC/NSZD/MNA, but approximately 2.5 to 5 times less expensive than the active remedies considered.

The report concludes the transition to a more passive remedy could result in significant cost savings, while maintaining an adequate risk management.


Learn about other case studies

Previous
Previous

Six Australian case studies of LNAPL NSZD rates using multiple methods, and comparing findings with conventional active recovery efforts

Next
Next

Comparison of NSZD Characterization methods